Purdue turf professor weighs differences between natural and artificial turf
WEST LAFAYETTE, Ind. —
As a debate arises in the NFL and other professional sports over the benefits of choosing natural or artificial turf for athletic fields, Cale Bigelow, professor of horticulture and landscape architecture in Purdue University’s College of Agriculture, suggests that both turf types have positives and negatives to consider.
Bigelow, who specializes in turfgrass science and management, explains that injury rates for athletes depend on multiple factors, making it difficult to position one turf type as better than the other.
“What we know about natural grass fields is that they’re really good and actually preferred by a lot of athletes, but they are also limited by how much they can grow and recover,” Bigelow said. “But what I can also tell you is a frozen natural grass field is not as safe for athletes as a nonfrozen synthetic field.”
Bigelow is available for interviews on this topic by Zoom and in person on Purdue’s campus.
Writer/Media contact: Jillian Ellison, ellison1@purdue.edu
Source: Cale Bigelow, cbigelow@purdue.edu
Note to journalists:
More Purdue News
Raman confirmed as U.S. undersecretary of commerce for standards and technology; Lundstrom appointed dean of engineering
June 1, 2026
Purdue veterinary medicine launches pet care app for Apple platforms
May 21, 2026
Purdue University confers Drew Brees and Tim Cahill with honorary doctorates at spring ceremonies
May 18, 2026
Purdue celebrates over 10,000 graduates for second consecutive year at spring commencement ceremonies
May 18, 2026