PNG's current research examines the connection between mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) biomechanics and the underlying pathophysiology as well as methods for the prevention of mTBI. Our research methods include the use of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), neurocognitive testing, sports telemetry, finite element analysis, . By combining these diverse methods, PNG seeks to better understand the nature of mTBI and to develop improved methods of detection and prevention.
PNG's research is supported through grants from the Indiana Spinal Cord and Brain Injury Research Foundation, a part of the Indiana State Department of Health, and through GE Medical.
In 2010, Talavage et al. provided the first direct evidence of subconcussive injury. They began a prospective, multimodal study of concussion in a high school football population using head impact telemetry, neurocognitive testing (ImPACT), and functional neuroimaging (fMRI). Changes in neural health were determined by establishing a subject-speci_c pre-season baseline for ImPACT and fMRI against which subsequent in-season and post-season follow-up sessions could be compared.
As expected, concussed players exhibited clinically-identifiable symptoms and measurable deficits both in ImPACT and fMRI. These subjects were said to exhibit both “clinically-observed impairment" and “functionally-observed impairment" and were labeled COI+/FOI+. Conversely, some subjects who were not diagnosed with a concussion neither presented clinical symptoms of concussion nor exhibited appreciable changes in their ImPACT or fMRI results. Therefore, they were labeled COI-/FOI-. Surprisingly, 50% of the asymptomatic players studied by Talavage et al. exhibited substantial changes in their ImPACT and fMRI results that were on the level of the COI+/FOI+ players. These players were designated COI-/FOI+.
Further analysis of the COI-/FOI+ group indicated that they had sustained significantly more hits throughout the season than their COI-/FOI- and COI+/FOI+ peers, particularly to the Top-Front region of the head. Moreover, changes in the frontal lobe were found to correlate with the number of hits to the head sustained at the time of the in-season scan. A follow-up analysis by Breedlove et al. indicated that fMRI changes in the asymptomatic (i.e., COI-) players existed on a continuum. The number and location of hits throughout the season and in the week preceding the scan were found to correlate with fMRI changes in both COI-/FOI- and COI-/FOI+ players, which indicated that, as Talavage et al. had stated, the defining difference between the COI-/FOI+ and COI-/FOI- group was the number of hits they had sustained. Given this observation, Breedlove et al. suggested that players more simply be classified as symptomatic (COI+/FOI+) and asymptomatic (COI-/FOIx).
Breedlove et al. also reinforced the notion that subconcussive hits “set up” the concussion by observing that the changes in fMRI for COI+/FOI+ players also strongly correlated with the number and location of hits to the head. Therefore, the hits leading up to the concussion contribute toward increasing levels of damage until the final, concussion-inducing blow is the “straw that broke the camel's back". This helps to explain why hit magnitude is a poor predictor of concussion.
Larry J. Leverenz, PhD, ATC
Clinical Professor
Department of Health & Kinesiology
Eric A. Nauman, PhD
Associate Professor
School of Mechanical Engineering
Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering
Department of Basic Medical Sciences
Thomas M. Talavage, PhD
Professor
School of Electrical & Computer Engineering
Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering