DNA samples from Purdue, Kew fungi collections provide key to mushroom 'tree of life'

May 22, 2015  

tree of life mushroom

Mycologist Catherine Aime stands over a fungal "tree of life" in Purdue's Arthur Fungarium. (Purdue Agricultural Communication photo/Tom Campbell)
Download Photo

WEST LAFAYETTE, Ind. - Genetic material from fungi collections at Purdue University and the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, helped a team of researchers resolve the mushroom "tree of life," a map of the relationships between key mushroom species and their evolutionary history that scientists have struggled to piece together for more than 200 years.

The group used DNA from frozen, heat-dried and freeze-dried specimens to analyze a dataset of 39 genomes representing most of the known families in Agaricales (ah-gehr-ah-KAY-leez), the order that houses some of the most familiar kinds of mushrooms, including cultivated edible mushrooms, magic mushrooms and the deadly destroying angel. High-throughput sequencing technology allowed the scientists to define seven new suborders and the "trunk" of the Agaricales tree, providing a framework for testing hypotheses of the evolution of mushrooms.

"Mycology really is one of the last frontiers in biology," said Catherine Aime, associate professor of mycology, the study of fungi. "We know there are six to 20 times more species of fungi than plants, but we don't really know much about them. People have tried to figure out how mushrooms are related since the time of Linnaeus. It's gratifying to finally solve this mystery."

Fungi are essential to the health of ecosystems, plants and animals. They decompose fallen wood and other organic matter, breaking down material and freeing up nutrients for other organisms. Most land plants rely on beneficial fungi to deliver water and other nutrients, and the gut fungi of ruminants such as cows play a vital role in digestion. Most humans also host fungi, which help maintain the balance of our natural flora.

But despite their importance and rich diversity, comparatively little is known about fungi. Many species have "cryptic and unpredictable life histories," Aime said, making them difficult to study. The vast majority of fungi are microscopic with few orders producing visible mushrooms. Some species have complicated lifecycles that have no analogy in other multicellular organisms. Others are extremely rare and represented by only a few records or are impossible to detect with conventional methods.

The elusiveness of fungi is one reason why fungaria - collections of preserved fungal specimens - are so valuable, Aime said. They offer a panorama of the diversity of known fungi and are often the only places where rare species can be studied.

 "To go out and recollect many of these specimens from nature would take decades, if not lifetimes," she said.

But until recently, fungaria were of limited use for genetic research because of the technical complexity of genome sequencing and the poor quality of DNA samples obtained from old, dried specimens. Advances in technology, however, enabled Aime and her fellow researchers to use short DNA sequences from fungaria at Purdue and Kew to knit together entire genomes and identify genes that could be used as markers to link related species of mushrooms, resulting in the tree of life.

The tree provides the clearest and most detailed glimpse to date of the fundamental relationships between mushrooms and when certain types may have evolved. Aime said that the tree suggests the earliest Agaricales were decomposers or biotrophs, organisms that derive their nutrition from other living organisms, a category that includes pathogens.

"We've had this view that organisms became more 'selfish' as they evolved, learning how to take advantage of the system by becoming pathogens," she said. "But it's possible that selfishness happened first, and over time, some of these species coevolved to become more mutualistic."

Aime said that the study also highlighted the importance of fungaria as scientific resources for the genomic age.

"We may be on the verge of a major collections-based revolution," she said. "People think of fungaria as similar to stamp collections - they're not. These collections anchor our concepts of everything in biology and are our only repositories for some dying or possibly already-extinct species. It's extraordinarily important that we try to collect and preserve as many species as we can. Future technology may allow us to use those materials in ways we can't even imagine now. We've got to get them before they go."

The paper was published in the Biological Journal of the Linnean Society Wednesday (May 20) and is available for journal subscribers and readers at Purdue at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bij.12553/full

The British Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs provided funding for the research. 

Writer: Natalie van Hoose, 765-496-2050 nvanhoos@purdue.edu

Source: Catherine Aime, 765-496-7853, maime@purdue.edu 

Note to media: Catherine Aime will be unavailable to take calls or respond to emails from May 31 to July 2. During this period, please contact study co-authors Jorge Diaz-Valderrama at 765-494-7791, jdiazval@purdue.edu, or Bryn Dentinger at +44 (0)20-8332-5106, b.dentinger@kew.org 

Related website:

Purdue University Department of Botany and Plant Pathology: https://ag.purdue.edu/btny/Pages/default.aspx 


Tales from the crypt: genome mining from fungarium specimens improves resolution of the mushroom tree of life

Bryn T. M. Dentinger 1, 2; Ester Gaya 1; Heath O'Brien 3; Laura M. Suz 1; Robert Lachlan 4; Jorge R. Diaz-Valderrama 5; Rachel A. Koch 5; M. C. Aime 5

1 Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, TW9 3DS, UK

2 Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Cledwyn Building, Penglais, Aberystwyth, SY23 3DD, UK

 3 School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Life Sciences Building, 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol, BS8 1TQ, UK

4 Department of Psychology, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, UK

5 Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, 915 W. State St., West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA

The enormity of the breadth and depth of specimens held within the world's biological collections offers unparalleled opportunities to capture genomic data from across the entire range of known biological diversity. Such a task would take many lifetimes to complete if we could rely only on fresh samples. High-throughput sequencing provides a technical solution to the long-term problems of recalcitrant and degraded DNA typical of museum specimens, suggesting that we may be on the verge of a major collections-based revolution. Although the potential is great, the feasibility of using preserved collections for large-scale, taxonomically comprehensive phylogenomic studies remains unknown. In the present study, we demonstrate the continued relevance of fungarium collections in the genomic era by analyzing a genomic dataset composed of 39 genomes representing 26 family-level clades, including 14 newly generated draft genomes derived from short-read shotgun sequencing of preserved specimens, frozen and freeze-dried material, representing most of the known families of Agaricales. We predicted homologues of 210 putative single copy genes in the newly generated draft genome assemblies, of which 208 were used for phylogenetic reconstruction. Our analyses resulted in a robust and, for the first time, fully supported phylogeny of the Agaricales, enabling the recognition of seven suborders and providing a resource for testing hypotheses of the evolution of mushrooms. Our analysis of optimal combinations of ranked genes using an information theory-based method provides guidance on gene selection for future studies, enabling efficient application of high-throughput sequencing techniques toward unlocking the potential of collections-based research in the genomic era. 

Ag Communications: (765) 494-2722;
Keith Robinson, robins89@purdue.edu
Agriculture News Page

Purdue University, 610 Purdue Mall, West Lafayette, IN 47907, (765) 494-4600

© 2014-18 Purdue University | An equal access/equal opportunity university | Integrity Statement | Copyright Complaints | Brand Toolkit | Maintained by Marketing and Media

Trouble with this page? Disability-related accessibility issue? Please contact us at online@purdue.edu so we can help.