sealPurdue News
_____

February 27, 1998

Proper planting helps continuous no-till corn

WEST LAFAYETTE, Ind. -- Using row cleaners and planting off the old rows may allow farmers to plant continuous no-till corn, say two Purdue University researchers.

Terry West, research agronomist, and Gary Steinhardt, professor of agronomy, said that both techniques help to improve the seed bed and allow better seed placement. The row cleaners scrape away crop residue for a new row six to 15 inches to the side of the previous year's row.

Both researchers cautioned that although proper planting will improve continuous corn yields, it still may not yield as well as rotating corn and soybeans.

Planting no-till corn on a field that was used for no-till corn the previous year is not a popular technique with most farmers. "It's murder," Steinhardt said. "Yields can drop 15 to 20 percent."

Continuous corn can be a problem because the corn residue left over from the previous year's crop keeps the soil temperatures too low for the corn to germinate properly. Other factors, such as nonuniform seed depth, "hairpinning" of the residue and uneven plant emergence also contribute to poor yields.

But according to West, some farmers may have little choice. "Some farmers who plant continuous corn need it for livestock," he said.

For farmers who are considering planting no-till continuous corn, though, the researchers found a technique that appears to help yields. In tests at Purdue's Agronomy Research Center near West Lafayette, West and Steinhardt found that planting off the old row and using row cleaners improved yields.

Both researcher stressed that taking two years' data and heading for the fields is not always wise. "One thing that's important in tillage research is multiple years of data -- otherwise you really don't have anything to hang your hat on," Steinhardt said. "Some years anything works. Other years it's a completely different story."

However, Steinhardt said that in this case using row cleaners seems to be encouraging enough that farmers may want to test them for themselves. "I would consider it a prudent thing to do," he said. "We can't demonstrate a statistically significant yield advantage with row cleaners with just two year's data, but it was obvious that with them we didn't have to do as many depth adjustments. So if nothing else it is a labor-saving device."

West said it's important for farmer's using row cleaners to make sure they are adjusted properly. "Adjust them so that they are just clearing away the debris and not disturbing the soil. You want them to just graze the top of the soil," West said. "It may be that as you pass through the fields the row cleaners occasionally may not be turning."

In addition to the no-till recommendations, West and Steinhardt have these additional recommendations for planting success:

Sources: Terry West, (765) 494-4799; e-mail, twest@purdue.edu
Gary Steinhardt, (765) 494-8063; e-mail, gsteinha@purdue.edu
Writer: Steve Tally, (765) 494-9809; e-mail, tally@ecn.purdue.edu; Web, www.agcom.purdue.edu/AgCom/homepages/tally/
Purdue News Service: (765) 494-2096; e-mail, purduenews@purdue.edu


* To the Purdue News and Photos Page