|
PURDUE UNIVERSITY
OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
EXECUTIVE MEMORANDUM No. C-39
(Supplements Executive Memorandum No. C-1 dated August 22, 1983
and
Supersedes Interim Faculty Policy on Conflicts of Interest and Commitment
dated December 30, 1991)
To: Vice Presidents, Chancellors, Deans, Directors, and
Heads of Schools, Divisions, Departments and Offices
Re: University Policy on Conflicts of Interest and Commitment
INTRODUCTION
This policy is intended to serve as a guide for Faculty and Staff
members in structuring their relationships with industry and other
outside ventures in view of their responsibilities for teaching,
research, administrative activities and service. It is not the intent
of this policy to eliminate all situations of conflict of interest,
but rather to enable Faculty and Staff members to recognize situations
that may be subject to question and ensure that such situations
are properly reviewed and, if necessary, supervised or monitored.
Some conflicts of interest, however, will be prohibited. The guidelines
are intended to maintain the professional autonomy of Faculty and
Staff as appropriate to their respective disciplines and professional
activities. These guidelines should be viewed as complementing and
elaborating Executive Memorandum No. C-1
and the University's policy on consulting (see Faculty and Staff
Handbook).
The policy fulfills two other purposes as well. First, it provides
Faculty and Staff members with meaningful guidance for the continued
development and future structuring of productive external relationships.
Secondly, the policy will provide assurance to the Faculty, Staff,
the University and most importantly the public, that potential Conflicts
of Interest have been examined and will be conducted in a manner
consistent with institutional and public values.
TYPES OF CONFLICTS
CONFLICTS OF COMMITMENT:
Conflicts of Commitment relate to the devotion of time and energy
to external activities. With the acceptance of a full-time appointment
to the University, an individual makes a commitment to the University
that is understood to be full-time in the most inclusive sense.
Full-time members of the Faculty and Staff are expected to devote
their primary professional loyalty, time and energy to their teaching,
research, administrative, responsibilities and service activities.
Accordingly, they should arrange outside activities and financial
interests so as not to interfere with the primacy of these commitments.
Members of the Faculty and Staff whose appointments are less than
full-time are expected to devote professional loyalty, time and
energy to their teaching, research and service activities in accordance
with their agreed-upon time commitments. For these Faculty and Staff
members, conflicts of commitment relate only to those external activities
to be undertaken within "University time" or those which
compromise the individual's ability to meet his/her University responsibilities.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST:
Conflict of Interest occurs when a Faculty or Staff member, any
of his/her family or associated entity, receives personal financial
reward from his/her University position in a manner which may bias
the individual's judgment, or compromise his/her ability to carry
out the contractual obligation for teaching, research, administrative,
and service responsibilities. In certain cases where a Faculty or
Staff member may benefit personally from his/her activities, this
benefit may be permitted following disclosure and approval.
GUIDELINES FOR CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The following is a representative and non-inclusive list of extramural
relationships subject to this policy. These examples have been divided
into three groupings. Category I consists of relationships
that, while conflicts in a technical sense, are allowable because
they are (a) accepted practices and (b) generally minimal in their
personal financial impact and impact on the University. A second
classification, Category II, consists of instances that will
ordinarily be permissible following disclosure and, where necessary,
the implementation of oversight procedures designed to ensure academic
standards, intellectual values, and institutional integrity. Category
III consists of relationships that may be allowable after disclosure,
review and approval with oversight by a standing committee of the
University.
These classifications are not intended to serve as a comprehensive
code of conduct or to define rigid rules with respect to conflict
of interest. It is expected that the guidelines will be applied
in accordance with the mission of Purdue University. Hence, an integral
part of the adaptation to the guidelines will be a process of interpretation
and application by a standing committee. By this process, it is
expected that a common institutional experience in the application
of these guidelines will gradually evolve. Finally, the complexity
of the subject matter is such that the current guidelines and their
ensuing interpretations should be formally reviewed on a periodic
basis.
The impact of a Faculty member's conflict of interest on students
(including that of post-doctoral fellows and other trainees) is
of special concern to the University. Students, post-doctoral fellows,
and trainees should not ordinarily participate in research that
involves confidential information or otherwise constrains their
right to publish or communicate freely. Additionally, the University
is particularly concerned about the content and quality of the educational
experience for students whose research is sponsored by a for-profit
business and whose preceptors have a personal interest in that business.
It is essential that Faculty members demonstrate at all times their
commitment to the highest intellectual and ethical standards in
all aspects of research, particularly that research in which opportunities
for conflict may exist. As a corollary, the educational experiences
of students are expected to incorporate the values of objectivity
in research and the importance of public trust.
Lastly, the rigorous application of the guidelines will be particularly
important in the case of persons exercising significant authority.
There are those in the Faculty and Staff who have substantial influence
over others by virtue of their major role in professional appointments,
promotions, tenure decisions, allocation of space, and determination
of salary. Typically these individuals hold positions such as Dean
of a School, Head of a Department, major professor or senior colleague.
While the guidelines are applicable to all Faculty and Staff, these
individuals with great influence over the careers of others and
resource allocations must take particular care not to become involved
in conflicting relationships that would lead to their personal financial
gain or that would adversely affect the professional or academic
advancement of Faculty colleagues, Staff members or students.
The following section provides examples of potential conflicts
in all three categories. This list is not inclusive and serves only
to illustrate the nature of situations which can give rise to conflicts
of commitment and interest. These situations call for interpretation
and review with department supervisors against the context of the
Faculty and Staff member's professional area, and the extent, nature
and consequences of involvement in specific external activities.
CATEGORY I: ACTIVITIES THAT ARE ROUTINELY
ALLOWABLE WITHOUT APPROVAL
Examples of activities:
- receiving royalties for published scholarly works and other
writings,
- accepting honoraria for commissioned papers and occasional lectures,
- receiving royalties under institutional royalty-sharing policies,
or
- accepting prizes and awards for recognition of professional
excellence.
CATEGORY II: ACTIVITIES THAT ARE ORDINARILY ALLOWABLE
FOLLOWING DISCLOSURE AND APPROVAL
The following activities must be disclosed on Purdue University
Form 32A and submitted for review. For certain cases, approval may
require specification of conditions or the use of oversight procedures.
Example of Activities:
RESEARCH ACTIVITIES
- participating in research on a technology invented or developed
by that Faculty member or a member of his/her family, and the
technology is assigned or contractually obligated to a business
not owned by the Faculty member or a member of
his/her family.
EXTERNAL ACTIVITIES
- assuming an executive position in a not-for-profit business
engaged in commercial or research activities,
- assuming ownership or partnership of, or is an officer, director,
consultant or agent for a for-profit business engaged in commercial
or research activities,
- possessing a financial interest in a business which competes
with the services provided by the University, or
- assuming certain public offices either by election or appointment;
employment outside of the university; and assuming any connection
with a professional association, educational institution or foundation
as a trustee, officer, or public representative.
PUBLIC DISCLOSURE
- publishing or formally presenting research results, or providing
expert commentary on a subject which covers Intellectual Property
or products developed by Faculty member with concomitant disclosure
of Financial Interest relating to such results or such subject.
CATEGORY III: ACTIVITIES THAT MAY BE ALLOWABLE ONLY
AFTER
DISCLOSURE, REVIEW, APPROVAL AND OVERSIGHT
The following activities must be disclosed on Purdue University
Forms 32A and 35. In certain cases, responses on Form 32A may direct
the Faculty/Staff member to fill out a Form C1. When approved, these
activities would ordinarily require oversight.
Example of Activities:
RESEARCH ACTIVITIES
- participating in research on a University technology that is
assigned or contractually obligated (by license or exercise of
an option to license) to a business in which the Faculty or Staff
member, a member of his/her family, or an associated entity has
a consulting relationship, holds a stock or similar ownership
interest, or has any other financial interest, other than receipt
of University supervised sponsored research support or royalties
under institutional royalty-sharing policies,
- receiving University supervised sponsored and other funded research
support (whether in dollars or in kind) or assigning students,
post-doctoral fellows or other University employees to projects
sponsored by a for-profit business in which he/she, a member of
his/her family, or an associated entity holds a stock or similar
ownership interest, or
- receiving financial compensation for conducting research externally
that would ordinarily be conducted within the University.
BOARD MEMBERSHIPS
- serving on the Board of Directors or Scientific Advisory Board
of a business from which that Faculty or Staff member or a member
of his/her family receives University supervised sponsored research
support or with which the University has a contractual relationship.
TECHNOLOGY EVALUATION
- participating in the evaluation (as an individual or member
of a committee) of a Technology which is assigned or contractually
obligated (by license or exercise of an option to license) to
a business in which that individual, a member of his/her family,
or an associated entity has a financial interest. The level of
financial interest allowable will be determined during review
of Form 35.
ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITIES
- taking administrative action within the University which is
beneficial to a business in which a Faculty or Staff member has
a financial interest.
OPERATING GUIDELINES FOR THE PURDUE UNIVERSITY POLICY ON
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND COMMITMENT
Purdue University recognizes that external activities can advance
its ability to provide high quality research and educational experiences
for students. External activities congruent with the professional
expertise of the Faculty or Staff Member and consistent with the
mission of the corresponding department enhance the individual's
professional development and enrich the learning community as a
whole. In addition, activities such as licensing of technology,
consulting or business start-ups are critical to meeting society's
needs.
At the same time, all members of the University must be committed
to conducting themselves in accordance with the highest standards
of integrity and ethics. This includes identification of the potential
for conflicts of interest and the assurance that they do not improperly
affect the conduct of University activities. This is not to eliminate
all conflicts of interest but to set forth the guidelines and procedures
for proper disclosure and management of these situations.
These guidelines describe a process for the disclosure of outside
activities for those Faculty and Staff Members reporting to the
Office of the Executive Vice President for Academic Affairs (EVPAA).
A parallel process should be followed for those Staff Members reporting
to the Executive Vice President and Treasurer (EVPT) and other offices
at Purdue University.
DISCLOSURE OF OUTSIDE ACTIVITIES
- Each Faculty and Staff Member will annually disclose any activities
outside of the university which may potentially involve business,
employment or vocation; or appointment to other positions or responsibilities
as defined by the Faculty and Staff Handbook and the Policy on
Conflicts of Interest and Commitment (see attachment). Faculty
and Staff Members of the University should not engage in an outside
activity unless prior approval has been obtained from the President
of the University or his designee.
- The regulations of the Trustees contain the following: "No
employee of the University shall be permitted to engage in any
business, employment or vocation; or to accept appointment to
other positions of trust or responsibility, or otherwise to divert
his interest and attention from University duties without the
consent of the President of the University." In particular,
the regulation is understood to cover: (1) connection with any
business enterprise as owner, partner, officer, director, consultant,
or agent; (2) connection with any public office either by election,
appointment, or employment; (3) connection with any professional
association, educational institution, or foundation as trustee,
officer, employee, or public representative.
- Form 32A "Application for Permission to Engage in An Outside
Activity" is used for the disclosure of external activities.
One form is to be completed for each activity.
- This form will be reviewed and approved/ disapproved by the
Department Head who will forward the application to the Dean for
approval/disapproval. For final review, this form is forwarded
to the Office of the Executive Vice President for Academic Affairs.
Disapproval by the Department Head can be appealed to the Dean.
Disapproval by the Dean can be appealed to the Executive Vice
President for Academic Affairs. Final appeal is to the President.
At the Calumet, Fort Wayne and North Central campuses, this form
will be reviewed and approved/ disapproved by the Department Head
who will forward the application to the Dean for approval/disapproval.
For final review, this form is forwarded to the Office of the
Chancellor. Disapproval by the Department Head can be appealed
to the Dean. Disapproval by the Dean can be appealed to the Office
of the Chancellor. Final appeal is to the President.
- The approved Form 32A does not replace the need to also complete
a Form 33 or 33A for leaves associated with the activity.
- The Policy on Conflicts of Interest and Commitment defines three
categories of activities.
- For Category I activities, a Form 32A is not
required.
- Category II activities may be approved following disclosure
on Form 32A. In some cases, it may be approved with conditions
and/or modifications. In other cases, implementation of oversight
mechanisms may also be recommended by the Office of the Executive
Vice President for Academic Affairs.
- Category III activities disclosed on Form 32A will
require completion of a "Disclosure of Relationship with
Outside Organizations" (Form 35). A Form C-1 ("Conflict
of Interest Disclosure" statement) will also be necessary
if a conflict exists as defined in Executive Memorandum No.
C-1. This states that Purdue officers and employees serving
"in positions involving any authority to purchase or contract
on behalf of the University, must file disclosure statements
with the Board of Trustees, stating any financial interest which
they have in any University contract or purchase."
The disclosure forms will be considered confidential and made
available only to those individuals duly charged with the responsibility
for review. Offices of the Department Heads, the Deans, and the
Executive Vice Presidents will establish means for the preservation
of confidentiality. The disclosure forms, however, are subject
to the Public Records Statute of Indiana.
- In the case of Faculty or Staff Members who hold the positions
(or equivalent title) of Executive Vice President for Academic
Affairs, Vice President, Chancellor, Dean, or Head of a Department,
the "Permission to Engage in Outside Activities," and
review of outside relationships will proceed as follows:
- Heads of departments will report directly to the Dean of the
respective School.
- Directors that are accountable to a Dean will submit disclosures
to that Dean.
- Deans and Academic Vice Presidents will report to the Executive
Vice President for Academic Affairs,
- Chancellors, and Executive Vice President for Academic Affairs
will report to the University President.
- The University President will report to the University Board
of Trustees.
ESTABLISHMENT OF OVERSIGHT FOR CATEGORY II AND III ACTIVITIES
Note again that the following guidelines describe a process
for the disclosure of outside activities for those Faculty and Staff
Members reporting to the Office of the Executive Vice President
for Academic Affairs (EVPAA). A parallel process should be followed
for those Staff Members reporting to the Executive Vice President
and Treasurer (EVPT) and other offices at Purdue University.
CATEGORY II:
To request approval for engaging in Category II activities, the
Faculty/Staff Member must submit a Form 32A for each activity. If
this activity is to extend beyond one year, annual renewal must
be sought through an updated Form 32A. If a "yes" response
is given to any question in Part 2 of Form 32A, then the Faculty/Staff
member must also submit a Form 35 and Form C-1.
The Department Head and Dean are responsible for monitoring and
when necessary, providing oversight of the approved category II
activities to ensure compliance with the Purdue University Policy
on Conflicts of Interest and Commitment.
CATEGORY III:
To request approval for engaging in Category III activities, the
Faculty/Staff Member follows the same process as that specified
for category II activities.
For certain cases, oversight mechanisms for category III activities
are to be specified in a Memorandum of Understanding at the request
of the Office of the Executive Vice President for Academic Affairs.
As part of the Memorandum of Understanding, the Faculty or Staff
Member is asked to provide detailed information on the nature of
the potential conflict by filling out the Conflict of Interest Information
Survey. The Memorandum of Understanding is to be developed by the
Faculty or Staff Member and endorsed by the department head and
dean. It should address the potential conflicts as disclosed in
Form 35, Form C-1 and the Conflict of Interest Information Survey,
and specify the details of the oversight process, the responsibilities
of the department head and dean, and reporting conditions to EVPAA
on the activities.
The Standing Committee (see below) is responsible for making recommendations
on the approval/disapproval or modification of the Memorandum of
Understanding. The committee is expected to seek advice from individuals
outside as well as within the institution in preparing the recommendation.
The associated rationale and details must be presented to the EVPAA
for review and approval - a process intended to ensure uniformity
in the structuring of effective oversight procedures.
STANDING COMMITTEE ON CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND COMMITMENT
The President will appoint a standing committee made up of representatives
from the Faculty. For regional campuses, it may be appropriate to
augment the membership of the committee by members from those campuses.
The committee will have the following responsibilities:
- make periodic recommendation to the President on the institutional
policy and procedures pertaining to conflict of interest and commitment,
- for category III activities, the committee will make recommendations
to the EVPAA on oversight procedures suggested by the Faculty/Staff
Member and his/her respective department in the proposed Memorandum
of Understanding, and
- review cases in which an appeal is submitted or non-compliance
has occurred and make recommendations to the EVPAA on resolution.
COMPLIANCE RESPONSIBILITY
Purdue University expects its Faculty and Staff Members to comply
fully and promptly with the policy. The Office of the Executive
Vice President for Academic Affairs is responsible for overseeing
the implementation of the policy by all Schools including the processes
and mechanisms for disclosure, review and oversight. It has ultimate
responsibility for confirming compliance by all members in the West
Lafayette and regional campuses.
The Office of the Executive Vice President for Academic Affairs
will review all breaches of the disclosure process, including (a)
failures to comply with such process, whether by virtue of a Faculty/Staff
Member's refusal to respond or by his/her responding with incomplete
or knowingly inaccurate information, (b) failures to remedy conflicts,
and (c) failures to comply with a prescribed oversight plan. Such
cases will be forwarded to the Standing Committee for review. Based
on its review, the Committee will make recommendations to the Executive
Vice President for Academic Affairs for further action. In all cases,
Faculty and Staff Members will be provided the explicit opportunity
to respond to the committee and Executive Vice President for Academic
Affairs first in writing and after, if appropriate, in person to
the issues raised in the course of such review. Any such written
response will be appended to the Committee's report for review by
the Executive Vice President for Academic Affairs.
Instances of deliberate breach of policy, including failure to
file or knowingly file an incomplete, erroneous, or misleading disclosure
form, violations of the guidelines, or failure to comply with prescribed
monitoring procedures, will be adjudicated in accordance with applicable
disciplinary policies and procedures of the University.
RECORD RETENTION
Approved Forms 32A for outside activities and Form 33 for leaves
of absence (of ten or more days) will be retained in the individual's
personnel file in accordance with University record retention guidelines.
Personnel Services is responsible for maintaining this file which
is retained permanently. Form 33A for leaves of absences of less
than ten days is retained by the Department for seven (7) years.
In accordance with Executive Memorandum No. C-1, a copy of the approved
Conflict of Interest Disclosure Statement (Form C1) will be retained
on file in the Treasurer's Office. Form 35 and the Memorandum of
Understanding for category III conflicts will be retained on file
in the Office of the Executive Vice President for Academic Affairs.
FEDERAL COMPLIANCE
Guidelines of the National Science Foundation and regulations of
the National Institute of Health require institutions participating
in funded projects to have a written policy on conflicts of interest.
The investigator, co-principal investigator, or any other person
at the institution who is responsible for the design, conduct or
reporting of the sponsored project must disclose significant financial
interest that would reasonably appear to be directly and significantly
affected by the sponsored activities. Investigators must submit
all required financial disclosure at the time of proposal submission
and update this information as new interests are obtained during
the life of the project. In accordance with this regulation, potential
conflicts will be disclosed on the Proposal Transmittal Check Sheet
which will accompany each proposal. The Proposal Transmittal Check
Sheet will be retained in accordance with Federal record retention
requirements in the Division of Sponsored Programs project file.
The institution must certify compliance on each proposal. If a
potential conflict of interest has been disclosed, then resolution
strategies must be put in place before an award can be accepted.
This requirement will be met by implementing the Memorandum of Understanding
on oversight processes. The institution is also required to appoint
an authority to sign each disclosure certification and be responsible
for the policy. The Director of the Division of Sponsored Programs
will act in this capacity since all information will be submitted
with the proposals through DSP.
OPERATING DEFINITIONS
- An "Associated Entity" of a Faculty or Staff member
means any trust, organization or enterprise other than the university
over which the Faculty or Staff Member, alone or together with
his/her Family, exercises a controlling interest.
- "Business" means any corporation, partnership, sole
proprietorship, firm, franchise, association, organization, holding
company, joint stock company, receivership, business or real estate
trust, or any other legal entity organized for profit or charitable
purposes, but excluding the university or any other entity controlled
by, controlling, or under common control with the university.
- "Contractual Relationship" refers to an agreement
or an option to an agreement under which there is an exchange
of goods, services, or money between or among the parties to the
agreement.
- "Executive Position" refers to any position which
includes responsibilities for a material segment of the operation
or management of a Business.
- "Faculty Member" means any person possessing either
a full or part-time academic, research scientist, or research
professional appointment in the university.
- "Staff Member" means all temporary or regular clerical/service
and administrative/professional employees, and all graduate student
employees.
- The "Family" of a Faculty or Staff Member includes
his/her spouse and dependent children.
Abiding by the intent of Purdue's anti-nepotism policy (Executive
Memorandum No. C-24), note that a potential conflict of interest
may arise when the party holding the "Financial Interest"
as defined in (h) below is related to the Faculty or Staff Member
(in ways other than spouse and dependent children) as father,
mother, brother, sister, uncle, aunt, son, daughter, niece, nephew,
grandparents or by marriage. Financial Interests held by this
party should be disclosed by employee to the best of his/her knowledge.
- A "Financial Interest" is an interest in a Business
consisting of any stock, stock option or similar ownership interest
in such Business, but excluding (1) any interest arising solely
by reason of investment in such Business by a mutual, pension,
or other institutional investment fund over which the Faculty
or Staff Member does not exercise control; or (2) receipt of,
or the right or expectation to receive, any income from such Business,
whether in the form of a fee (e.g., consulting), salary, allowance,
forbearance, forgiveness, interest in real or personal property,
dividend, royalty from the licensing of Technology, rent, capital
gain, real or personal property, or any other form of compensation,
or any combination thereof; or (3) financial interests in the
Business if the value of the interests meet both of these conditions:
(a) it does not exceed $10,000 and (b) it does not represent more
than 5% ownership when aggregated for the Faculty or Staff member
and his/her Family.
- "Participate" means to be part of the described activity
in any capacity, including but not limited to serving as the principal
investigator, co-investigator, or research collaborator. The term
is not intended to apply to individuals who provide primarily
technical support or who are purely advisory, with no direct access
to the data (e.g., control over its collection or analysis) unless
they are in a position to influence the study's results or have
privileged information as to the outcome.
- "Sponsored Research" means research, training and
instructional projects involving funds, materials, or other compensation
from outside sources under agreements which contained any of the
following:
- The agreement binds the University to a line of scholarly
or scientific inquiry specified to a substantial level of detail.
Such specificity may be indicated by a plan, by a stipulation
of requirements for orderly testing validation of particular
approaches, or by the designation of performance targets.
- A line-item budget is involved. A line-item budget details
expense activity, function, or project period. The designation
of overhead (or indirect costs) qualifies a budget as "line
item."
- Financial reports are required.
- Unexpended funds must be returned to the sponsor at the conclusion
of the project.
- The agreement provides for the disposition of either tangible
or intangible properties which may result from the activity.
Tangible properties include equipment, materials, records, technical
reports, theses, or dissertations. Intangible properties include
rights in data, copyrights, or inventions.
- "Technology" means invention, procedure, process,
copyright, know-how and materials intended for use in the private
sector.
Steven C. Beering
President
|